It is true to say that in the new millennium, the general public tends to follow specific similar lifestyle in terms of clothing, meals, and types of TV programs.
It is true to say that in the new millennium, the general public tends to follow specific similar lifestyle in terms of clothing, meals, and types of TV programs. This sweeping trend has a multitude of merits such as a higher standard of living and wider selection, and various drawbacks including losing the inherited culture and controlling the world by a few nations.
On the one hand, due to the globalization and borderless economy, far more people are exposed to various products and services compared with their forefathers. This may lead to better living condition for the individuals. As a case in point, normal people who are in developing countries can enjoy the accessories and programmes which modern people in developed nations have. Therefore, the quality of their life will be enhanced considerably due to globalization.
On the other hand, as the disparities among nations have eliminated gradually there is the danger of losing traditional customs. Due to the fact that residents are influenced by similar fashion and TV channels, it would be quite possible that in the long-term they value other cultures than their previous ones and abandon their previous lifestyle. In addition to this, because few countries have the power to generate specific products or services, they may gain more power and revenue as a result of globalization. In such a context, perhaps these few nations oblige other countries to follow their orders.
To sum up, it is crystal clear that better living condition could be provided as a result of following a similar lifestyle; however, traditions in developing countries may extinct in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... to say that in the new millennium, the general public tends to follow specific similar lifest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, in addition, such as, as a result, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15671641791 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88568686511 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9398348793 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.636363636 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234372672709 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108330920509 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.283047302256 0.0667982634062 424% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165845511416 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217071870062 0.056905535591 381% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.