It is widely accepted that people who have post-school qualifications earn a higher salary than those loss educated do. University students should, therefore, pay all the full cost incurred over the course of obtaining a college education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today, having a university certificate means that you have to study hard to pass both entrance and final examinations, so they deserve to receive better income than those who don't have lower education levels. From my point of view, I have strong views toward this opinion. I, however, strongly oppose to recommedation that students obviously have responsibility for 100 percents of tuition fees in universities or colleges because of several reasons.
There are two main reasons explain why graduates should have higher salary than those stopping learning early. First and foremost, students have to invest a lot of time into getting good qualifications. It is an expensive opportunity to take part in courses and accomplish all tasks, so they have run down business earlier than usual. Undeniably, it is actually difficult to well complete both extra-job and studying in university. Next, spending four years studying in universities means that they are trained in their major profession in depth. Then, they can make contributions to promoting the development in their field. It is not incomprehensible that they can get higher salary due to efforts they've made.
From a negative perpective, there is a fact that everyone isn't totally able to pay full cost for courses in universities. Universities should give awards for people who made efforts to reach the flying colors. Specifically, in case students have good performances, goverments and universities ought to support them with schoolarships. In the other words, the talented schoolars coming from poor families are difficultly capable of showing their potentials without schoolarships. I do trust that creating chances for the talented means gaining a brighter future from young generations.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that the talented students coming poor families shouldn't be prevented from contributing to national development by economic burden. In consequence, I strongly have belief in the fact that society should be partly responsible for students' chances to develop their talent and try to have significant results during the period they study in university. Their efforts deserve an exellent qualification and better income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to receive better income than those who dont have lower education levels. From my po...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r colleges because of several reasons. There are two main reasons explain why g...
^^
Line 2, column 702, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...ey can get higher salary due to efforts theyve made. From a negative perpective, the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...rpective, there is a fact that everyone isnt totally able to pay full cost for cours...
^^^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... talented students coming poor families shouldnt be prevented from contributing to natio...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42028985507 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06215662444 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602898550725 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6490083946 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72222222222 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216955952869 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062225569249 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484357543491 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125660796641 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317969787851 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.