Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and place of the offence. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.
Laws are mandatory and inevitable part of modern civilized country. So, opinions vary on should the laws be amendable with respect to different circumstances or it is better to have strictly bounded rules and guidelines to maintain healthy political and socio-economic relationships. I definitely stick to the second point of view, because laws must be stable and equal for everyone in order to avoid systematic abuse of them.
First and foremost, flexible laws will cause people’s misunderstanding what is right and what is wrong: some people might be probably even unknown that they are co-participants of the crime. As opposed to the first, dramatical share of perpetrators will get an opportunity to shun an acclaim and find excuses, what will sequentially increase the crime level. Furthermore, the implementation of bendable laws leads to the difficulties in maintaining honest judgments and providing justice towards people who really deserve it. For instance, it could be confirmed by the accident of a famous Russian actor Michael Efremov. Unfortunately, he was an opposer of current Russian government and now he is blamed in the crime he did not take part in, because of amendable laws. Secondly, amendable laws decrease the population fear of punishment, therefore frees the hands of criminals. The flexible laws become more vulnerable and, in the end, ineffective, in this way the country’s regulative sphere appears to be weak and inappropriate to work successfully.
But as opposed to the previous, laws flexibility definitely helps people, who did crimes, which are positive for society, or who committed them unintentionally find the loopholes in the rules and avoid punishment. Moreover, with the passage of the time some laws and guidelines become obsolete and unrelative for further performance, so they require to be transformed with regard to modern conditions.
To conclude, I believe, that flexible rules and regulations would instill and augment the crime level inevitably, harming all life aspects of citizens. The lack of fear of punishment will lead to the chaos arisen in the society. Flexibility in law deteriorates the overall performance of system and justice based on circumstances less productive. Notwithstanding, the update in law is needed as time changes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35855263158 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17893041724 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621710526316 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7088425925 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.307692308 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176186598346 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558712749127 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430715495924 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949547050059 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486905384025 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.