Leaders and directors in an organization are normaly older people. Some pleople think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics: Leaders and directors in an organization are normaly older people. Some pleople think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree

Saeedeamani's picture

People have different views about whether older or younger staffs are suitable for important positions in an organization. While some believe that high place should be taken up by senior people, it is in my opinion that younger people could show better leadership for some reasons.

On the one hand, navigating a big organization is a complicated job. Then it could have some challenging aspect about directing it. For example, aged people worked for many years while they accumulate more work experience in comparison with younger ones. So not only might they make their decisions more wisely but also they bring more benefits for their organizations. Another significant reason is that they are more respected by their colleagues and have a powerful voice. Therefore, it is more likely that younger people listen them. As a result, the sinier impact on them effectively.

On the other hand, I believe it will better if heavy responsibilities be held by younger people. Since they are physically stronger, they can work more hours handling big responsibilities. In spite of the old who can not working long hours with much pressures. Additionally, the young are more creative. So they are likely to come up with workable solutions in situations dramatic. Last but not least, in the most case, the younger ones are more educated. Thus they can offer better advertising strategies which can increase dramatically the sales.

In conclusion, while I accepted the experienced individuals can be effective leaders, I think that leading a company should be given to younger people. The more people have knowledge, the better they can lead a party.

Votes: 
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
More essays by this user:

Pages

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People have different views about whethe...
^^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...voice. Therefore, it is more likely that younger people listen them. As a result,...
^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndling big responsibilities. In spite of the old who can not working long hours ...
^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sponsibilities. In spite of the old who can not working long hours with much pre...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ld who can not working long hours with much pressures. Additionally, the young are ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...se, the younger ones are more educated. Thus they can offer better advertising strat...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17164179104 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89454851679 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0443365694 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8888888889 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137309421354 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451363836502 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539554293967 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104568865496 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527071206663 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages