Libraries are indispensable to most of the students and people who keen on reading. There has been considerable changes in the facilities inside the libraries over the recent years. Recently, the technological equipmnet are increasingly introduced in the libraries. However, people claim that libraries should emphasize on updating technological structure instead of increasing the books collection. I partially agree with that and I think paper books have its merits to human.
It is irrefutable that establishing more technological resources is beneficial to every individual as the modern technology provide massive convenience for human beings. People could access to any information with more availability from the advances of computer. A compelling example of this can be seen in the internet─The internet encompasses a wide variety of information and academic articles in diverse aspect such as science, education, and environment. In this case, the internet is not only handy for people in search of the needed information, but also more available than paper books.
However, paper books do have positive influence on the society and individual as well. On one hand, people could borrowed the textbooks and academic papers from the libraries. This provides more freedom and flexibility for the students and people who in need of the books. On the other hand, reading is a fundamental ability to every citizen in the community. Since the arrival of sophisticated and up-to-date technology,fewer people are willing to read the paper books. Therefore, there is a tremendous drop in people's literacy and reading comprehension. In this case, paper books should be remained in the libraries.
By way of conclusion, I reiterate my opinion as argued above. Even though technological create more convenience and accessibility for people. Paper books, from my perspective, is vitally importance as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the facilities inside the libraries over the recent years. Recently, the technolo...
^^
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'books'' or 'book's'?
Suggestion: books'; book's
...cal structure instead of increasing the books collection. I partially agree with that...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'borrow'
Suggestion: borrow
...dual as well. On one hand, people could borrowed the textbooks and academic papers from ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... flexibility for the students and people who in need of the books. On the other h...
^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , fewer
... sophisticated and up-to-date technology,fewer people are willing to read the paper bo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, well, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55136986301 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2387683574 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551369863014 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0747519898 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3157894737 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3684210526 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154924997202 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479428465579 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360072195567 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935781759299 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174199237931 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.