Life expectancy is increasing. What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

Life expectancy is increasing. What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or negative development?

Improving medical care and enough food consumption boost the number of elderly people globally, and this trend might be beneficial to cut crime rates. However, the financial burden both families and states will increase much.
Admittedly, the successful medical invention and genetic engineering make people living longer. When vaccines and antibiotics for lethal diseases have been found, the treatment for patients will be efficient and immune system provides complete protection so that the mortality rate is fewer than before. When this condition is supported by the availability of adequate nutrition from animals and plants thanks to scientists, people can meet a healthy diet easily the main reason for improving cell age. For example, hundreds of people have been killed by smallpox diseases as the virus is very replicable and contagious, but after a particular drug is found, the germ not only can be diminished immediately but also such treatment prevent patients from reinfection. Therefore, the proportion of elderly people will outnumber young people around the world.
The need for special medical treatment and day-to-day support increase the state and family expenditure. However, the high proportion of older people makes the community safer as they give to share moral value and not disturbing others by doing criminals, so the government can cut the money allocated in law enforcement. Nevertheless, the contribution of younger people cannot be underestimated in terms of nations’ development, and this work is impossible tackled by those who experience aging as people can only work efficiently until around 50 years old. For example, the establishment of the fastest train to deal with crowded population in the cities is employed by the majority of young people aged from 30 to 45, and this invention succeeds to reduce the use of fuel, in fact, less money spent by commuters and not using other transportation. This is one of the discoveries that modernize human life and increase well-being.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39116719243 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92281124654 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602523659306 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3912330558 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.416666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137845192407 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522723538094 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520962195763 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914235702248 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266106154245 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.