Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
When living abroad where people’s mother tongue is no longer dominant, one of the greatest challenges in social issues is to encounter language barrier. It is admittedly believed that this will bring immigrants into several persistent problems. Pondering upon this issue, I suppose that these practical problems are inevitable but development in technology has made them less relevant for decade.
First and foremost, the ability to persist is what I put into my priority. Needless to say, not being able to fluently speak a foreign language would significantly cause the breakdown in understanding amongst people with different nationalities. As a highly likely consequence, immigrants’ survivability would be potentially jeopardized. Due to the deficiency in linguistic skills, emigrants are bound to suffer from being unable to get daily necessities done and becoming less qualified in job markets in the country they are living. For instance, every year, the United State expects an influx of several thousand settlers from different countries with different cultures. Recruitment, therefore, becomes increasingly more competitive and those having limited access to English initially cannot reach the command of the employment’s criterion. By and large, limited linguistic skills restrict people from surviving in the unfamiliar environments.
The further point holds no less importance in my argument is the predicament in integrating with the community. It cannot be denied that emigrants with bounded both linguistic and cultural repertoire find it overwhelming and strenuous to understand the native, thus misunderstanding and misconception will be inevitably caused. Without doubt, the native people may fail to understand, which leads to discrimination and harsh racism towards immigrants. As an unpromising result, this will result in further social isolation, emigrants’ misery and also mental illness. All in all, integration brings immigrants persistent problems in living abroad.
In conclusion, survivability and difficulty in integration are tenable reasons for my preference. Taking my analysis in to meticulous consideration, I believe that emigrants should take the most advantages of technology and prepare carefully to overcome practical problems when inhabiting a new country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9223880597 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27141572375 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650746268657 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6672697776 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.705882353 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159069730507 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427392393461 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385291082492 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899971113277 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335586294098 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.