Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems

In life, sometimes we have to live in a country which requires us to speak nonnative language. Some people believe that this situation will cause problems in both social and practical matters. I completely agree with this view because of several reasons.

Firstly, having to speak in foreign language can cause social problem because language serves as a communication bridge between people. All communications are done using a language, whether it is just a short conversation or long conversation. Thus, if someone is unable to speak language which is mainly used by most people, he will most likely to be isolated from any social group. For instance, a guy from United States just moved to Japan, where most people there are speaking in Japanese. Because he does not really understand Japanese, he then finds difficulty in blending with people in his neighborhood and working place.

Next, having to communicate in nonnative language can cause practical problem because language is inseparable from doing any daily activity. All daily activities, from riding public transportation to ordering food menu require understanding of foreign language. Then if someone does not master the language which is mostly used in a country, he will experience practical problem where his process of doing daily activities are hampered. For example, a woman from United Kingdom just migrated to Taiwan, where Mandarin Chinese becomes a language which is mainly used in that country. Almost all things, including food menu, is written in Mandarin Chinese. Because she does not really understand Mandarin Chinese, she then finds difficulty in ordering food menu.

In conclusion, having to speak in nonnative language can cause both social and practical problems because language serves as a communication bridge between people and language is inseparable from doing any daily activity.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, really, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39455782313 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80379412786 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6158286487 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33211195814 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118829918627 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128851696385 0.0667982634062 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240095938949 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528000065256 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.