The rapid development of humans in the world is gradually putting animals at risk of extinction because of people's activities. This happens on land and under the sea and could stem from many reasons, requiring a solution to this problem.
The main cause comes from humans using the environment of animals to carry out activities that benefit creatures. On land, they exploit the natural environment for domestic, industrial, and commercial activities for urban development. This leads to the forest turning into barren land and animals losing their habitat. Therefore, animals have to move to other places such as zoos, and they lack the ability to live naturally, causing species to fall into a state of no suitable breeding ground and gradually in danger of extinction. For example, in 2020, the Government licensed the Apple Company to exploit the Cuc Phuong forest to make a tourist area. This caused the animals to be brought into the zoo, and the rhinoceros became extinct when they could not adapt to the current environment. Concurrently, the water source is often polluted because of toxic wastewater and untreated waste from factories and households. For example, the Apple Company, when exploiting as a tourist resort, discharged a lot of dirt into an adjacent lake, causing a series of fish deaths.
We need to take timely measures to prevent the extinction of animal groups. Incidentally, the Government should tighten regulations on forest exploitation and strictly manage the waste activities of enterprises. Firstly, it is necessary to protect and reforest to support degraded ecosystems to help fauna have a natural development environment that is convenient for breeding. Secondly, control waste activities strictly to avoid contaminating water origins because the government will have to spend much money on water treatment and aquatic animals will find it difficult to survive when the water source is damaged or polluted.
In conclusion, we should limit all activities that harm the lives of animals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, incidentally, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30841121495 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86674784792 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566978193146 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3519866529 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21184235506 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069835016202 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633308596593 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130817938003 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870256733283 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.