Opinions are divided on whether the government should spend time and energy on wildlife protection or give money to people living in economically underprivileged areas of the world. The latter, in many cases, should be more beneficial.
Wild animals make a significant contribution to medicine. This is because wild animals in the struggle for survival with different organisms produce their own antibacterial as well as cancer cells. Therefore, exploring and researching the characteristics of these animals will help scientists find new and effective treatment solutions for seemingly incurable diseases. In the US, more than a quarter of prescriptions are reported to contain substances found in plants and animals. Without antibiotics from wild animals, thousands to millions of people die every year.
Although I mostly support the aforementioned point, to play the devil’s advocate, I would entertain a counter-argument. Admittedly, some people may think that there are still many people in difficult economic circumstances who have not been helped, but there are still departments and organizations that spend time and money to protect wildlife. Nevertheless, plans to protect wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man. According to some American researchers, the disappearance of animals will create a global biological disaster, not only creating the practice of killing dead animals, but also leading to the origin of collecting living land and resources, water, gas source, ... and create explosive wire reaction would not reverse. It would be a mass extinction event that threatens the entire existence of human species on the planet.
In conclusion, the protection of animals is very necessary because if they are hurt, humans will also be affected.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57564575646 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17023276068 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638376383764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3135551148 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.928571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27496291865 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771273944638 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903037434274 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167600026494 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116379397481 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.