Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development

It is undeniable that online courses have gained huge popularity in most tertiary education institutions’ curriculum. This point, in my opinion, is a positive trend considering that it offers students not only flexible but also time-saving and money-saving learning programs.
First, given the flexibility of schedule, such study courses should allow students to study in a flexible way. That would encourage them to learn at their own pace and at times that would be much more suitable, helping them acquire and broaden their knowledge more easily. Better still, when online lectures are recorded via online learning platforms, such as Google Meet or Microsoft Teams, learners would easily review the lectures when needed in a way that physical classes cannot offer. If it were you, would you advocate this kind of learning?
Second, universities’ internet - based courses would offer students the saving of time and money. The idea for this is that they would not have to pay much attention to the commuting to in-person classes and campus expenses. Moreover, the tuition for online learning programs should be lower than that for on-campus programs. For instance, Anna, my sister, only had to pay 1000 USD within nearly three years to attain an MBA degree via an online course in a different country, which is more advantageous than any in-person courses of Vietnamese universities.
In conclusion, I believe that the offering of online courses at some universities is a positive development given that it would make education become more convenient in terms of flexible schedules and the saving of time and money.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a flexible way" with adverb for "flexible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... courses should allow students to study in a flexible way. That would encourage them to learn at ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25384615385 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79040333253 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592307692308 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0110673833 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.181818182 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231359517669 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886133700619 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590164661766 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151370869838 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433471243215 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.