In many cities today, most people live in a large apartments blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?
Nowadays, there are lots of transformation can be notice in houses which build by humans for living as compared with past. Moreover, in earlier periods people stayed in huts which made by mud and bamboos but in present times they set up cement, concrete and brisk homes. However, a majority of masses who lived in urban areas give preference to stay in huge flats blocks but it has many drawbacks such as perilous for relationships, have not found big space, go into depth of debts, noisy environments as well.
The main dark side of humans living in big building blocks is that it is not only affects person’s relationship but also brakes them. Apart from this, if people start staying in large apartments blocks than they think that they have won higher status in communities. In addition to this, they never likes to meet their poor relatives. Due to these, their Wealthy weaker relatives start hating them which causes of brake relations. The another major concerning area for having huge building blocks are those a vast amount of citizens sharing similar building that is why it is crucial the noise level of there will be increasing dramatically which leads to noise pollutions. For example, a survey conducted by media reported that the noise level of India’s big cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Ludhiana and etcetera showing a drastic rise with the passage of time which detrimental for surrounding.
Furthermore, the various cons of this perception is that masses cannot find a vast amount of space in their apartments according their desires. Even though , they are not able to get garden and their own garage in these houses. Moving further, the reason is that the space of these flats have already fixed when the design of these buildings are starting. On the other hand, a great majority of people take big credits to buy a new large apartments due to get loans they are going into bankruptcy situations because sometimes they are not eligible to return debts. For instance, according to the survey of newspaper conducted in 2017 reported that 65% people who living in metropolitan areas taking aloans from banks to purchase a large apartments blocks.
In conclusion, although it is modern phenomena to stay in huge flats in citified areas but it has many disadvantages which leads to several complications. Beside that, masses have always fear of earthquakes which throw their lives in dangerous and many more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rson's relationship but also brakes them. Apart from this, if people start s...
^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ives. Due to these, their Wealthy weaker relatives start hating them which causes...
^^
Line 9, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nts according their desires. Even though , they are not able to get garden and the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00737100737 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64714959902 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570024570025 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9479402338 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.375 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4375 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189342346263 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611047142437 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539843225681 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119105342437 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276271876762 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.