In many countries, the government likes to spend more money on art. Some people agree with this. However, others think government should spend more on health and education.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Art of a nation is a crucial asset of preserving its heritage and culture. In this contemporary era government and its organizations spend a large amount of money to maintain good condition of old artifacts, carved monuments and so on. With reference to above context some people believe its right thing while other people believe, that the capital should be invested in health and technology sector. I partially agree with this.
To embark with, it can be noted that, ancient art must be preserved so that our future generations can have a glance at exquisite things of culture and heritage of a realm. The venerable art of a nation is a piece of glory for its denizens although that piece is not valued much by the people. The regime of every country put in suitable efforts and money to preserve art. For example, at an old monument there are many workers assigned to maintain its beauty.
However, on the other end, there is a belief of some inhabitants that despite of spending the money for maintainence of veteran art, it should be invested for health facilities and better technology which can have a positive impact on the economy of a country. For example, more and more money should be invested in research of new technology which can reduce global warming.
To conclude, it can be noted that, money should be spent on both technology and preservation of art. If the money is spent equally, no consequences can be arised in future regarding both issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Art of a nation is a crucial asset of pr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sector. I partially agree with this. To embark with, it can be noted that, an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers assigned to maintain its beauty. However, on the other end, there is a be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ogy which can reduce global warming. To conclude, it can be noted that, money...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, while, for example, with reference to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8031496063 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67892485025 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543307086614 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0442838606 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239527957128 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918659822164 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530834439664 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145121100623 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651270921679 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.