Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects. But others believe that teenagers should focus on the subject that they are good at or that they find most interested . Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There are variety of subjects which are included in school syllabus of every student in this contemporary era. With reference to the above context , some people believe that an apprentice should learn and focus on every subject of their co-curriculum while some people believe that they should be focusing on subjects in which they are interested or good at. I strongly believe that a disciple should wade through subjects of their own interest.
To embark with, it can be noted that if a student centralize the subjects in which he/she is good or performing well then eventually they can master that particular subject and can also shape a better future for themselves as well as their nation. By doing so there will be a positive growth in their overall development. Moreover, after a long time the disciples would be satisfied by their work.
However, on the other hand, nowadays people guide their children to learn every subject even if their child is weak in one or two subjects. When students learn each and every subject they get discouraged because of their failure in weak subjects while they also get de-moralized of their capabilities.
To conclude, it can be noted that, a novice should always centralize the main subjects of their own interest. Consequently it can be noted that there are some pupils who are able to cover up all the subjects and they should be encouraged by their parents. Regimes should also take suitable steps for the proper welfare of students and their interests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There are variety of subjects which are ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...era. With reference to the above context , some people believe that an apprentice ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough subjects of their own interest. To embark with, it can be noted that if ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ples would be satisfied by their work. However, on the other hand, nowa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... de-moralized of their capabilities. To conclude, it can be noted that, a nov...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...he main subjects of their own interest. Consequently it can be noted that there are some pup...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, as well as, with reference to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94094488189 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60917259346 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523622047244 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2572483972 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.090909091 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300976096164 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128213160683 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119262137437 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204185357661 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135300062764 0.056905535591 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.