In many countries, governments are spending a large amount of money on improving Internet access. Why is it important and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
It is true that, in many regions of the world, authorities have become more and more concerned about extending Internet access. While there are some important reasons accounting for this trend, I consider that it should not be the top government priority.
This tendency is attributable to at least two major causes. One principal reason is that the Internet offers a wealth of free information, which provides people with golden opportunities to be more informed and educated. In reality, thanks to the introduction of Internet connection, students now can take advantage of distance learning courses in order to simply widen their horizons or even gain qualifications. Another cause is that governments could campaign for many key issues via technological advances, such as websites or social networks. For instance, if there is an outbreak of some epidemic, the authority could warn their citizens of the dangers and instruct them to take necessary precautions by posting an article on their official website.
Useful may Internet access be, I believe that the government should allocate their resources to more urgent issues. Firstly, more public spending should be poured into alleviating environmental degradation. Obviously, global warming, which stems from a marked increase in greenhouse gases, has increased the risk to humans of facing many fatal diseases and damaging natural disasters. Secondly, in many developed countries, the lack of schools and college has led to the shortage of an educated workforce, which is vitally important for the national economic growth. Thus, national and local authorities ought to invest more heavily in the field of education rather than in Internet technology.
In conclusion, although I admit that Internet connection does offer many benefits, I am persuaded that it is more crucial for nations to spend on the environment and education.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45578231293 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93641250425 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65306122449 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1198277804 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.384615385 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154043179526 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541429750514 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441580069706 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098784456526 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032829583067 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.