In many countries, not enough students study science subjects. What are the causes? What will be the effect on society?
In recent years, the trend of many students preferring to study social courses such as literature than science courses like chemistry has risen significantly. From my perspective, this phenomenon can be attributed to some reasons, and numerous drawbacks may grow in the community if this aspect continues for a long-time period.
There are two main reasons why the proportion of students not chosen to study science subjects increases gradually. First and foremost, science subjects require a mass of formulas, theories, and parameters, along with the need to use logical thinking, consistency in explanation, and acquire all the knowledge learned before to solve science problems accurately. However, not all students can utilize these skills proficiency, as well as memorize the formula and statistics in a short time. Besides, science subjects take a lot of time to learn and apprehend. Compare this with social courses that require practicality and not spending too much time studying. Therefore, the students are more interested in taking comparatively easier subjects. Furthermore, students usually have higher grades in social subjects than the science ones in examinations. To illustrate, according to the parameters in the 2022’s National High School Graduation Examination enumerated by the Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam, the proportion of candidates who scored greater than or equal to 8 points in social courses such as literature, history is 70%, double than the figure in science.
From my point of view, the phenomenon of the declining number of students studying science courses can bring adverse effects on society. Initially, the unemployment rate in branches concerned with science subjects such as health, technology, and economics may rise rapidly. Hence, this circumstance could lead to prolonged disequilibrium in the labor market. Furthermore, science research may be diminished because of the lack of researchers and fellows. Thus, this affects the quality of social life. For instance, the technology sector may regress because of the shortage of manpower, which causes challenges to humans to produce a contemporary product with better functions than the present.
In summary, science subjects play a crucial role in the growth of every nation. I believe that students should change their ways of learning science subjects and enhance their knowledge by having a passion for these courses. With more students studying science courses, more employees in the science industry and economics may grow gradually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...ver, not all students can utilize these skills proficiency, as well as memorize the fo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...des in social subjects than the science ones in examinations. To illustrate, accordi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5912596401 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95121503306 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575835475578 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.121408031 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.473684211 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219849185843 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711381330502 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052974323009 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139767333393 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234534951413 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.