In many countries, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
Nowadays, more people choose to live by themselves or live with only one or two families, which is quite different from the last generation. This trend could contribute to social development, although it also has some downsides.
Living alone or living in small family units is beneficial to personal development. Solitude provides independent living space, so that people can have few restrictions in their daily life. In other words, they can manage their time freer and more flexible, which has opposite effect on their career. They can learn specialized knowledge and professional skills after work to enhance their working abilities. Having more free time also helps to keep a pleasant mood. People can take some exercise or foster a habit instead of dealing with mass, tedious housework. So this kind of lifestyle might contribute to efficient work and brilliant life.
Moreover, this trend could increase consuming demands. People live in smaller family units, leading to higher needs of necessities. For instance, they need an apartment definitely. Some families also need cars or other transportation tools. Besides these, other necessities including furniture, electric appliance are indispensable. Those things can be shared if living in a big family. In this perspective, this trend increases demands and promotes consumption, which facilities economic growth.
However, this lifestyle also has some drawbacks. It has negative impact on relationship between families. Families may lack communication because of not living together. And it is easy to feel lonely if living alone. As time passes, the family bond could be less closer, which is adversed to social harmony.
To summarize, this trend is beneficial to personal development and social economy, although it can cause the weakening of family affection.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, more people choose to live by ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to social development, although it also has some downsides. Living alone or...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... although it also has some downsides. Living alone or living in small family u...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to efficient work and brilliant life. Moreover, this trend could increase cons...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion, which facilities economic growth. However, this lifestyle also has some dr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less close'?
Suggestion: less close
...s time passes, the family bond could be less closer, which is adversed to social harmony. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., which is adversed to social harmony. To summarize, this trend is beneficial t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50177935943 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86967816097 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8962066795 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.2727272727 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.7727272727 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240707761658 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709578199959 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703833235173 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138529589793 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230635642302 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.73 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.