There are number of nations, which become on under poverty level. Because, in these countries the population increased dramatically and proportion of oldish ages are growing. In now days the technological revolution is evident of live life long. Because, they provide a better medication for any ailment. It has great influences on society. I agree with the former view.
There are number of people who believe that, oldies are important since they have an extensive experience of various social systems. It is evident that, elderly people have a better knowledge of surviving. Apart from that, the blessings of older people are very important for younger ones. Because, they can learn good, and achieve better in their life with the help of inspiration of older people. Moreover, the elderly people know more about culture, traditions, rituals and they provide this information to their children. Which is very important to balancing in cultural identity
There are opposing group of people, who argue that older people are making problems for country. They claim that, there are number of oldies who put pressure on financial resources of the state. For instance many people have retired from services, and the government pays them as pension funds, without any economic contribution. Convincingly, the older people have their own opinions and they have more opportunities of job. Because, they can easily handle the situation. Whereas, in now days the company gives less chance to young people and they think that oldies are not beneficial for them.
Conclusively, there are number of answers for this question. In my opinion, the presence of older people are blessings of nations. The government needs to provide best services to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on under poverty level. Because in these countries the population increased drama...
^^
Line 2, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortant to balancing in cultural identity There are opposing group of people, who ...
^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd they have more opportunities of job. Because they can easily handle the situation. W...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, whereas, apart from, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23297491039 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63184475246 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1519558489 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.95 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170866628127 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501767748685 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542187282951 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101062354507 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511664334481 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.