In many countries schools have severe problems with students behavior.
What do you think are the causes of this?
What solutions can you suggest?
Recently, the phenomenon of student’s behavioral problems and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, although various countries are struggling with multiple problems regarding their students’ behavior, fining proper solutions will be far from easy. In my mind, students’ severe manners stem from miscellaneous such roots as psychological causes as well as socio-economic backgrounds.
Obviously, different level of schools, such as elementary and secondary schools, are like a second home for loads of students. Their ages are ranging from 7 to 18 years old. According to prominent psychologists, in this crucial period, students’ personality will be solidified by carrying out noble experiences. Hence, these experiences may lead to manifest enormous problems. Moreover, young students behold the universe far more different than adults, event their parents, and so the distinctive viewpoints bring with themselves a great number of difficulties.
In addition, in a school, social and economic backgrounds of students are extremely dissimilar. Some students are of wealthy families, while others may place amongst lower level of social positions, in terms of economical circumstances. The diversity paves the way to severe problems in schools. As a tangible example, it is more likely that wealthy, and probably stronger, pupils constitute a band in their classes. Thus, it ends up bullying behaviors against classmates.
On the other hand, distinctive approaches should be taken into account to cope with these issues. The first and perhaps the most significant solution is that psychological counselling should regularly be held at schools. Skilled, experienced consultants will come up with innovative answers to do with unique problems of students. Likewise, developing appropriate curriculums by which the value of such matters as learning sciences as its own sake, being a philanthropist, and equity could be taught is another solution.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on causes and solutions of student’s behavioral problems, I am inclined to believe that we shouldn’t lose sight of students’ vast energies. By the way, we should provide them with the opportunity to dare mighty things regardless of difficulties which may arouse.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, although vario...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... behold the universe far more different than adults, event their parents, and so the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... level of social positions, in terms of economical circumstances. The diversity paves the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, likewise, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus, well, while, in addition, such as, as well as, by the way, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74269005848 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2367826743 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652046783626 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4815423501 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.368421053 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203647857531 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560288360364 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516265184828 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110460216076 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604722358521 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, although vario...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... behold the universe far more different than adults, event their parents, and so the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... level of social positions, in terms of economical circumstances. The diversity paves the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, likewise, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus, well, while, in addition, such as, as well as, by the way, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74269005848 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2367826743 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652046783626 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4815423501 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.368421053 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203647857531 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560288360364 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516265184828 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110460216076 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604722358521 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.