In every country, there are some people who earn a lot of money as their monthly or yearly remuneration which is more than their need to survive in the world. Some communities believe that high wages are necessary for the development of the country. On the contrary, others have dissented ideas who think that the government should fix the salary to a certain amount. In the following paragraphs, both views will be discussed and finally, my opinion will be given.
On the one hand, a huge amount of salary means the government will get more money as tax, therefore, the authorities can utilize this for economic growth. For example, in Bangladesh, when an employee gets over 1 million BDT as a yearly salary, he has to pay the government 100 thousand as income tax. If they have this type of tax from many people, as a result, they can use it to build new roads and so on. Moreover, when a people obtain a better payment from the government or company he will not be interested to go abroad, and he can contribute to establishing a strong and stable economy. For instance, according to the survey of the BBC, in the UK the private company and the government both pay their employee a standard amount. As a consequence, they are not willing to go outside their country and the government earns a lot of revenue which they used to be an economically strong nation.
On the other hand, if the governing body fixation the wages to a definite amount then they will not have enough money from the general public. Therefore, people will not be satisfied, and corruption will be taken place. In addition, many people will go to foreign countries to have better jobs and facilities, subsequently, nations will lose their productive citizens. On the contrary, fixed wages will help to decrease discrimination in the office and help to improve productivity.
In conclusion, to sum up all the points above, it is clear that, high salary helps not only people but also the government, hence, I will go with the former statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hey will not have enough money from the general public. Therefore, people will not be satisfie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73937677054 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73336315654 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529745042493 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6321544931 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1333333333 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231045540977 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798146222906 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434447255363 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143468473036 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062267167416 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.