In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, a limited number of people like managers, singers will receive a considerable amount of monthly income. It is good for their country that certain people agree with this argument. However, though some disagree with this view, they also accept that such extraordinarily large wages should not be permitted by governments. I assume individuals should earn wages that are above a certain amount, from my understanding.
On the one hand, individuals receive an incredibly large salary because they have been investing a tremendous deal of energy in challenging activities. Taking Alibaba's managers, is an example. He had not been granted some kind of work until he launched the business Alibaba. Additionally, his time commitment and sacrifices for his business are high. It is also quick to make it obvious that he earns an exceptionally large salary. In fact, their large incomes come from their experience, their commitment, and the energy they have spent. If some person has consumed their time to improve their knowledge, due to the efforts of that person they deserve a high income.
On the other side, persons who receive incomes above a certain amount have made a number of assets. They have invested their capital, for instance, in infrastructure in remote areas like Africa. In addition, they have donated their money to support the poor children, the poor family, and particularly an individual in their country in a difficult circumstance. Using Vietnam, for example, is an example; certain ngos support the needy or another individual in their tough condition.
In sum up, individuals who have invested time in self-improvement and seeking decent prospects merit their large pay as they had to risk many items to change their lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 522, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...ience, their commitment, and the energy theyve spent. If some person has consumed thei...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: They've
...in amount have made a number of assets. Theyve invested their capital, for instance, i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89844257969 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582142857143 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0426079937 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158113681455 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580846496161 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062149499199 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100121217197 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836327293468 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.