Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
Some companies have a policy that is giving extra money as a reward for people whose exceptional contribution to the company. Some people think that this practice might be positive to employees, but some believe that it can be some negative impacts on employees. In my mind, I agree that giving extra money as a reward is an excellent method to increase the excitement of people in working. However, it also causes some disadvantages on people.
It is like a coin has two sides, this style of management has both negative side and positive side. It is a fact that people want others to acknowledge their efforts. Hence, regarding to the positive side, the reward can make people think that their efforts are acknowledged from their bosses. Hence, they will work harder to earn more extra money rewards, and the environment is a competition one. However, regarding to the negative side, if a person has tried to earn the reward for a long time but that person still does not have any acknowledge from bosses, that person might be lost the career interest, which, thus, impact negative effect a business where that person is doing in the long term.
If managers can make their employees think that their company is their home, they will consume their energy to make their home better and more wonderful than other houses. It is clear that no people want to have a smaller house than their friends. Hence, employees will consume their time and their efforts in making the business better. Moreover, it will become a friendly competitive environment if managers have a wonderful knowledge and a variety of management skills.
To sum up, I believe that giving extra money as a reward is a wonderful way to make a competitive environment. However, in the long term, it causes some negative effects on businesses. Therefore, bosses should make their companies as the second home for their employees instead. In the long run, it will be favorable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, still, therefore, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85843373494 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59743186085 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448795180723 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3569531025 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8823529412 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337758170461 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108735649115 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783732756949 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21452571638 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10390111372 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.