Nowadays, some jobs do attract and offer a higher remuneration to a person due to high levels of skill that the person possesses.
In my view, any authority should be disallowed to put a cap on earnings of an individual getting generated from the job he or she is doing. Such people normally have skills that are niche and are not easily available in the market.
For instance, the work of a scientist is to do research and development in his field of education and knowledge. Any breakthrough in his field of research can prove beneficial for the country. Such kind of a job requires rigorous hard work, persistence and sleepless nights. Thus, scientists do have a higher pay as compared to people working in other fields of work. So the type and criticality of the task does attract handsome incentives in the form of money.
Another example is of a sports person. Athletes are trained on a sport from early stages of their lives. A huge amount of gruelling effort and money goes into their training on the sport and conditioning of the body to play that sport. Moreover, sports person represent a community or a nation at large. Thus, they should be handsomely rewarded so that more and more individuals can take inspiration from them by taking part in competitive games and contribute in bringing pride to the nation.
In the end, an elite and highly paid workforce is a country's biggest asset. They should be nurtured and motivated to continue working in their area of expertise so that the results achieved due to their hard work can be used for the betterment of the human race.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
... prove beneficial for the country. Such kind of a job requires rigorous hard work, persis...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...rm of money. Another example is of a sports person. Athletes are trained on a sport...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 53, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'countrys the biggest'.
Suggestion: countrys the biggest
...an elite and highly paid workforce is a countrys biggest asset. They should be nurtured and moti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, thus, for instance, kind of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72759856631 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69585044364 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573476702509 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7849521027 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927188554576 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288619166707 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282142606528 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0544942615374 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270301579125 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.