In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food which is having a negative effect on both family and societies. How far this statement is true use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It is incontrovertible fact that nowadays eating fast food habit became a trend. The traditional food are losing their charming day by day and the fast food attract the people more as compared to the home made food. However, it would be wrong to say that it have complete negative impact on both family and society because it has some positive impact. I will discuss the points of view in upcoming paragraphs.
To embark with, there are plethora of reasons why the traditional food has effected the society. The first and foremost is consumption of fast food and junk food is related to the health problems. The people are facing the numerous problems regarding their health like obesity, high cholesterol and skin problems. However, on the other hand, in this 24 hours working culture, people have no interest to prepare to the meal at home. So, the mostly people prefer to eat fast food because, it seems one of the best and right option. As well as, it is easy to prepare and always available in the market. In this way, the fast food spot the life of people.
To continue with my view points, it effected the family in some ways. The fast food are killed the family bonding because in the pastime family enjoying the food together. But, now many children's and adult just sit in front of the TV and eat from fast food packets held in their hands. It is harmful for the health as well as for the relationship.
In conclusion, each coin have aspects. If the fast food have bad impact on the society and family it has some positive effect. This food impact the health of the people but helpful in the modern lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...d the fast food attract the people more as compared to the home made food. However...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, so, well, as for, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58762886598 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37246837299 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522336769759 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.330397313 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.1666666667 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310399235037 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994402849235 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725676100786 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205102234996 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142382104096 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 12.4159519038 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.