Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think this a positive or negative development?

In this contemporary epoch, with revolution in transportation and technology the need of energy has arisen. This need is fullfilled by fossil fuel, whereas, nowadays numerous nations are moving to distinctive energy sources. However, I believe it is totally a positive phenomenon.

Admittedly, the fuels such as coal or oil release hazardous fumes when burnt to produce electricity.Therefore, it is making natural surroundings worse by polluting air, water and land, and consequently multifarious new ailments are found which have adverse effect on human body. To illustrate, recent research by world health organization state that less affulent nations with lower grade enegy production sources, are facing issues such as elevation in cancer, air born disease and skin problems. Thus, an alternative source can have huge difference in people's standard of living, making place safer of denizens. Hence, it make country greener and assisting both humans and environment.

Besides this, efficiency of fossil fuel is low about 40%, that means more than half of energy is wasted. While, other alternative sources, for instance hydro power plant convert most of energy into electricity. Ultimately, it can be proved, as, economical and money saved can be used for other developments. Moreover, other alternative source can meet the enormous needs of modern individuals, who from traveling to sleeping are highly dependent on electricity. So, when these non-renewable sources will be exhausted, pace of life will decrease. Deducing, to overcome this complication some other energy should be there.

In conclusion, in this present scenario electricity has become part of daily life, but, these present sources are not working well and will be finished in near future. Thus, moving to some other source is now seen as positive development which several nations are doing.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...fumes when burnt to produce electricity.Therefore, it is making natural surroundings wors...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...king place safer of denizens. Hence, it make country greener and assisting both huma...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52613240418 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03158715949 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679442508711 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2916127272 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249916027268 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738242829825 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300676779999 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132354195298 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165326296425 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.