Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think this a positive or negative development?
Determining the major source of energy has been high on agenda in the 21st century. When fossil fuels are gradually substituted by the application of alternative ones in several countries, it seems to me that this transition exerts positive influences because of the following reasons.
To begin with, it is recommended that fossil fuels should be replaced due to many drawbacks. Firstly, its negative impacts on the environment have been recognized. Indeed, the combustion of coal or oil releases an excessive load of volatile organic compound and greenhouse gases, which can be the major contributing factors to many urgent environmental problems, such as global warming, greenhouse effect or ozone layer depletion. Another minus stems from its limited supply. In fact, fossil fuels were accumulated by a complicated process, lasting for thousands of years. With the great demand for fossil energy today, it is predicted to be exhausted in the near future. In other words, if a country maintains its reliance on fossil fuels, it is more likely to suffer from an energy crisis in the upcoming years.
On the other hand, there are several strengths making alternative sources of energy advantageous. The first one is their environmentally friendliness. Specifically, studies have revealed that compared to fossil fuel, the application of solar power or wind energy contaminates a much lower amount of polluting agents. This creates a cut down on emissions, helping the society alleviate environmental problems due to our daily activities. Furthermore, the aforementioned challenge makes fossil fuels a stopgap measure for the energy demand. By contrast, alternative energy, the generation of which involves renewable sources, may tackle this problem by offering an unlimited supply.
Briefly, I believe that with their superiorities over fossil fuels, alternative sources of energy should be promoted to achieve sustainable development for nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nces because of the following reasons. To begin with, it is recommended that fo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n energy crisis in the upcoming years. On the other hand, there are several str...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, in fact, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57718120805 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07415519465 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624161073826 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7436935895 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253424355109 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710955138298 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411402876529 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147731983128 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00567757313424 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.