Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There have been heated controversies over governmental policies regarding national strategic objectives. While some people encourage a thriving economy to be the pivotal aim for administrations, others believe that there are some intriguing aspects that need equal attention from the officials. While there is some compelling evidence for the former statement, from my perspective, the latter makes more sense for some reasons that are going to be discussed in the essay.
On the one hand, supporters of boosting the economy point out the benefits of obtaining a developed economic system, which enhances citizens’ satisfaction and happiness in daily life. To be more specific, it is beneficial for every resident to live in a well-functioned economy, facilitating them to get access to modern infrastructures and high-quality services regarding medical care and insurance. Moreover, a thriving economy is a good indication that a nation is having financial potential, which eventually attracts foreign direct investment (FDI) into the domestic economic mechanism and creates opportunities for further outstanding improvements.
However, on the other hand, there are still some hot issues for governments to tackle simultaneously with economic affairs. First and foremost, it is recommended for officials to enact policies in terms of raising human development intelligence since it is a major standard in evaluating the quality of education within countries. Provided a country obtains high merits of public awareness, lucrative chances will arrive undoubtedly. Moreover, national and tribal unity inside a nation should also be taken into consideration. It is believed that connecting people and stamping out polarizations and discrimination between parties and tribes are among the most important goals for administrations to achieve before thinking about further aims.
In conclusion, while it is conceivable that economic progress plays a major role in a country’s development, I believe that it would be better for governments to share a balanced national focus with other fields, namely human intelligence and collective unity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79113924051 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29496491378 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1899061714 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.5 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204656288566 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064935027715 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596256646486 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116750420945 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467205387344 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.