The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart demonstrates the incomes of national exports in five differents distributions from 2015 to 2016. Simultaneously the table displays related data of changes in the proportion of exports in comparison of 2016 to 2015.
Overall, there are four categories that had proliferative earnings after one year of exporting leaving gems and jewellery as the only distribution which had declined its incomes from exportation.
Regarding exporting earnings, petroleum products and engineered goods took the lead with approximately 60 billion dollars in 2015 and rose up to about 72 billion dollars at the end of the next year. Agricultural products and textiles were two of the least profitable categories which obtained around 26 to 31 billion dollars in 2015 and both stopped around 33 billion the next year. Gems and jewellery could not accomplish the even incomes with 2015 as it dropped from 43 to 41 billion dollars.
Inspecting percentage changes, textiles was the most developed distribution with 15.28% of the increase, followed by engineered goods of 8.5%, petroleum with 3% and agricultural products which barely rose up to 1%. As the incomes deficit, gems and jewellery lost 5.18% of its previous year earning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'incomes'' or 'income's'?
Suggestion: incomes'; income's
...ucts which barely rose up to 1%. As the incomes deficit, gems and jewellery lost 5.18% ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33678756477 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99582248268 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575129533679 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1441520332 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210762161541 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103154020689 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779263514004 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137092334013 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985388638822 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.