The chart below shows the result of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the different demand for types of beverage drinking during the last four weeks in five cities of Australia.
At first glance, Australians' three main choices included installing fresh coffee, instant coffee, or taking a sip at the cafeteria.
Firstly, with the exception of Adelaide, spending time at coffee shops tended to be the most popular preference of Australians in four remaining cities in which over 55 percent of residents chose to dedicate their time at the café. This rate in Adelaide was just under 50 percent which was quite lower than the most common type of purchasing instant coffee occupying exactly 50 percent.
Simultaneously, instant coffee was the second most chosen in the other four cities which fluctuated 45 to 55 percent of all its residents. Eventually, the survey also showed that Australians were least into buying fresh coffee as it was the lowest rate of all five cities taking just 35 to 45 residential percentage among all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...aking a sip at the cafeteria. Firstly, with the exception of Adelaide, spending time at coffee shops...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11728395062 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68799342298 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.4360169795 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.166666667 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144512003106 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735416400765 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467747146776 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867871739729 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396193328077 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.