many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.

The governments of many nations argue that their primary goal should be economic development. On the other hand, some people are object to this and believe that other types of progress have the equivalent importance for the country. I will deal with these two contrasting views and after that write my opinions.

Those governments emphasizing economic progress the most think that economic stability is the most required factor to fulfill the minimum requirements to live like a human being. To live at least in the standard way, clothes, food and habitat are necessary, which we can obtain only if the country focus on the economic development. For example, if everyday we are in a predicament of worrying about purchasing those life supplies because of lack of money, the government’s efforts to improve people’s economic status will be essential to increase the quality of their life.

On the contrary, there are other opinions insisting that the progresses other than economic progress should be also considered importantly. Only with economic progress, we cannot reach the valuable life and that is why we need other types of progress such as social and cultural one. For instance, we can find many people suffer from serious social issues such as suiciding in some countries, even though their country’s GDP is remarkably high. What these countries are missing are spiritual values which not economic but social or cultural development can fulfil.

I agree with that economy should be the priority in the country where even the basic quality of life is insured, however I think after reaching the some extent of economic level, the equal emphasis has to be put on social or cultural progresses.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...red, however I think after reaching the some extent of economic level, the equal emp...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, as to, at least, for example, for instance, i think, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18996415771 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79499577593 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9669316342 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.636363636 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2727272727 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357878218279 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129064506667 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964095650417 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206013053118 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814019875012 0.056905535591 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.