Travelling to the worldwide famous attractions becomes the globalization tendency, as the result in concern for these historical buildings is forced to being destroyed. This essay will discuss on the consequence of this trends and what sort of strategy can be used for the prevention.
It is true that many ancient buildings is facing in several carelessness damages, firstly, because the authority administration wasn’t practiced completely maintained. Secondly, tourists are coming around the world with different culture and background, so they might break the rule without significant attention. For example, some people from Asia country’s is used to drop their personal waste on the street, but they bring this bad habit to the aboard, which cause the environmental issue to the local place. Therefore, those places should consider some prevention in order to protect their assets.
There are several solutions can be preformed in protecting these historical assets. Firstly, tour agent should educate their customers before visiting these countries. Tourism should take responsibilities with those historical buildings of government in order to provide the best travel experienced to the consumers. Secondly, those famous tourism countries’ government can impose the tax for their regular maintain. Some country such as Thailand they impose taxes from tourist when they pay for visa fee, and custom fee in order to maintain their facilities and buildings.
In conclusion, tourism is a great resource to a country’s benefit. Although there are some negative impacts might destroy the historic assets, but government and business should take responsibilities to protect it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ssay will discuss on the consequence of this trends and what sort of strategy can be...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, sort of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70355731225 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99081796679 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612648221344 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4395650323 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258270383531 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085879608779 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075995334693 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160123893472 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106717883002 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.