In modern life, the history of the world can be accessed at the museum where this place will offer some crucial knowledge since the world start. The information which show in the museum such as historical goods (artefact, fossil, myth story) shall be priced or it just invention which we do not pay for it so that Both parties have their reason to the argument whether the registration of the museum must be followed by money or it will prefer to settle that it is free.
To begin with, the invention of the rare thing is not cheap. Because of adherent right which many archeology has spent the time to break-down and analyze the fundamental revelation. It will make the museum shall be priced on it. For instance, some fossil of dinosaurs has been trapped in the long distance soil layer. The excavation of this project needs money to pay for mobilization such as excavator, transporter and human resources. Furthermore, the charge of the museum uses to maintain the facilities and to pay for the employers. This is why the admission of the museum will cover that endeavor.
On the other hand, many museums will offer knowledge just for free. There are some several explanations about the free charge museum. Firstly, It just provides intellectual which is not need more strive to get it. For example, in Surabaya, you will know about the Sampoerna Museum which is no charge to visit the museum because all of good just provide in artificial not original. Secondly, some facilities in the museum, in general, has been supported by government funding.
In conclusion, the more valued information that was collected by the museum will be paid by the money. As long as the registration price is still relevant to the public budget, it will give more advantageous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...h show in the museum such as historical goods artefact, fossil, myth story shall be p...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun archeology seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much archeology', 'a good deal of archeology'.
Suggestion: much archeology; a good deal of archeology
... cheap. Because of adherent right which many archeology has spent the time to break-down and an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...just provides intellectual which is not need more strive to get it. For example, in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84488448845 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6468235349 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524752475248 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3484596794 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299577712059 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105092799623 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915996342538 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174927304712 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989710342931 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.