Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is it the case? What can be done to attract local people to visit those places?
It is true that the number of museums and historical related sites mostly welcome foreign visitor, while such places are visited less often by the local. From my perspective, the major reasons for this trend are the well-acquainted with these destinations and the unattractiveness of locations mentioned above which can be addressed by diversifying the collection of artifacts and converting these attractions into the multi-purposes building complex.
There are two key grounds why more tourists from other countries than indigenous people pay visits to museums and sites of historical importance. Firstly, humans by nature are more curious about new things. Therefore, overseas travelers visit more frequently museums and historical places that provide resourceful and informative about the culture and history of the country they are coming, whereas these attractions are too familiar with the local residents. Secondly, lack of integrated entertainment and facilities of these destinations together with the limitation of artifacts are chief contributing factors behind the less appealing of museums and historical related places. As a result, the local pass them over.
However, some effective and feasible measures can be taken to deal with this phenomenon. Initially, a simple action would be calling for the donation from the public in order to increase the number of artifacts, resulting in drawing the attention of local residents. This can be illustrated by the war remnants museum in Ho Chi Minh City, which has kept the display of some outdated planes, photos of war victims and weapons for years, having added more artifacts through the donation old pictures and videos to foreign reporters. This leads to the higher attendance of the local to this museum. In addition, the local governments should integrate more functional building such as cinemas, restaurants, commercial centers into existing places to appeal more local visitors, especially youngsters because renovated attractions not only helps local residents to gain insight their nation’s culture and history through artifacts, widening their horizon but also are one-stop destination where they can combine visiting with shopping and relaxation.
In conclusion, it seems to me that lower attendance of local citizens than overseas tourists to museums and historical places, stemming from some origins described above. Nevertheless, there are efficient solutions to cope with this situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... As a result, the local pass them over. However, some effective and feasible mea...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'remnants'' or 'remnant's'?
Suggestion: remnants'; remnant's
...nts. This can be illustrated by the war remnants museum in Ho Chi Minh City, which has k...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67654986523 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96618205623 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576819407008 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.996414724 49.4020404114 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.428571429 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3147995881 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105842995893 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077293009815 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189995164282 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513049937114 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.