Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Several museums and historical sites seem to be attractive to tourists rather than locals. This essay will discuss some reasons why this is occurring, and effective solutions should be proposed to attract more locals.
Several factors are contributing to lower numbers of residents visiting museums and historical sites. Firstly, since local people may have a good understanding of their own culture and history, they do not need to visit such places. In contrast, because tourists are likely to be curious about a new place, museums and historical sites are good destinations for them to learn more about this place. Secondly, as historical places and museums seem to be boring to local people, these people prefer entertainment places such as cinemas and theatres. Meanwhile, travelers tend to visit special places such as museums or historical sites rather than these common places that their country also has.
Several actions need to be taken to encourage local people to visit their own museums and historical sites. First, visiting these sites should be included in the school curriculum when teaching local history. This can create more chances for students to go to these places. Furthermore, historical sites and museums should have more new documentary movies or different exhibitions to attract local people to visit more often. Finally, the government should introduce a special entry fee for locals to encourage them to go to such places.
In conclusion, tourists indeed have more interest in visiting museums and historical areas than residents. However, some measures can be taken to solve this issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33203125 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63733789027 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49609375 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0244307945 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.534795702434 0.244688304435 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19339924109 0.084324248473 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764242489573 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321455628391 0.151304729494 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905009529662 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.