Art classes such as painting or drawing are important for children's development, so it should be compulsory in high school. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people claim that art classes such as painting or drawing play an important role in children’s development so this type of class should be obligatory in high school. While it is true that art classes are beneficial for students to some extent, I disagree with the idea that students should be forced to take part in these classes in high school.
To begin with, there are some benefits of art classes for children’s development. Firstly, art can develop children’s creativity. For example, to draw a garden, each child has a different image of the garden or links many different ideas in a new way in their paintings. Therefore, this helps to improve their ability to think outside the box and innovate. Secondly, because children are free to draw what they like, they can express their own ideas, feelings, and personality through their art products. For example, children can choose any topic, color, and material to draw what they want on the paper. Thus, art subjects could boost the confidence and self-esteem of children.
However, I believe that art subjects should not be compulsory in high school’s curriculum because of some reasons. Firstly, many other subjects might also help children develop their creativity. For example, in literature children can paint a clear picture for readers with words instead of drawing. Furthermore, to equip them with enough knowledge and skills for their future, children might need to focus on other major subjects such as language, math, and social studies. Finally, because not all children love to learn art such as drawing or painting, they should not be forced to follow this subject in school.
However, I believe that art subjects should not be compulsory in high school’s curriculum because of some reasons. Firstly, since art classes do not provide essential knowledge, chidren should not be forced to learn. Furthermore, because not all children love to learn art such as drawing or painting, which leads to a waste of time of money. Finally, nany children do not have the talent to perform arts. For instance, some students who cannot sing well might feel embarrassed during lessons. This leads to negative impact on chidren.
In conclusion, while art classes can contribute to children’s development to some extent, I believe that these classes should not be obligatory in high school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... different image of the garden or links many different ideas in a new way in their paintings. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...he garden or links many different ideas in a new way in their paintings. Therefore, this hel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds to a waste of time of money. Finally, nany children do not have the talent to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12435233161 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6739265544 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471502590674 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1092612057 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1904761905 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.04761904762 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487379141521 0.244688304435 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151310368182 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113161435797 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317829981188 0.151304729494 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101126704315 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.