Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly by luck. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people say that luck is the main factor that helps people to reach their targets. While it is true that luck does contribute to a person’s achievements, I would argue that other elements are much more important.
To begin with, luck can play a role in helping people achieve their goals. Firstly, luck can bring some unexpected good opportunities to people, which helps them to achieve their aims fater For example, last month my friend suddenly received a good job offer from his dream company via Linkedin that he hadnever thought of before. Secondly, luck helps people achieve their goals more easily and faster. For instance, it can be better for motor racers to complete their race in good weather conditions rather than bad weather conditions. If there is no luck, people might have to put more effort into achieving their goals.
However, I believe luck is not the most vital element in people’s success. First, hard work is an important factor for people’s achievements. For example, many famous musicians such as Mozart, Beethoven started to learn classical music when they were young and then they had to spend a great amount of time composing music. If people are not hardworking, it will be hard for them to have enough ability to achieve their goals. Additionally, determination is another essential factor that supports people in achieving their goals. For instance, the author of Happy Porter had received many rejections from different publishers before this novel became a bestseller. As a result, thanks to determination people can overcome obstacles and failures to reach their targets without waiting for luck.
In conclusion, while luck can be a factor that helps people to achieve their goals, I believe that other major factors are contributing to their success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
...e nursing homes should be built so that more older people could live there instead of stay...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14788732394 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6132359599 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573943661972 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8917686452 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279751691321 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897096858296 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874153280748 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211026509564 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071466080644 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.