Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
There is no doubt that museums play a crucial role in imparting knowledge regarding various cultures and traditions of different nations. While there are many advantages of putting a price on tickets by the museum authorities, we should also consider the drawbacks of this action. I do not completely agree with the views and would support my explanation with relevant examples.
On the one hand, it is beneficial for the museum governing bodies to price a ticket for viewers. This is because, the valued art and artifacts need regular maintenance and new additions, which can conveniently be done by the collected money. For example, according to a report published in the New York Times newspaper in 2011, it highlighted the mesmerizing array of the displayed arts and sculptures in the city museum, which was possible by help of ticket money and generous donations. In contrast, many spectators are unable to afford the unpredictable hiked ticket prices. As a result, the purpose of museum to provide recreation and impart knowledge is defeated.
On the other hand, galleries tend to hike ticket prices according to their needs. The reason is that, many of the museums are owned by private companies, which exploit their powers without providing any justification. For instance, in my own experience, when I visited the “Famous City Museum” for the second time, the ticket prices were doubled. As a result, my budget got a setback as I am a student with fixed allowance. Therefore, I could not afford the visit. However, the museum governance needs to set rules and regulations monitoring the ticket prices for the benefit of art as well as people. Although, I believe that erratic changes done in ticket prices can be controlled and monitored by a countries’ government.
In conclusion, while the advantages of paying price for ticket is more as compared to drawbacks, I believe regulations should be set so that people are not financially exploited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ages of paying price for ticket is more as compared to drawbacks, I believe regula...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15217391304 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99025106041 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562111801242 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.279677978 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8125 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210582836615 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691119708514 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590740844886 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134728981436 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0080494977539 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.