Why do we need to prevent the extinction of some animals like dinosaurs and dodos if it is caused by natural processes? What is your opinion about this?
There is no doubt that it is our duty to save the rare species of animals (dinosaurs and dodos) for study and research purposes in times ahead. While there are some who believe that, it is necessary to control, their loss of life due to environmental effects. I do not completely agree with this view and would support my explanation with relevant examples.
On the one hand, many researchers concluded that it is not advisable to prevent the extinction of these rare animals. This is because, some of these species like dinosaurs are dangerous predators, which can harm human life at any moment. These creatures have an animal instinct that still can not be deciphered by sciencetists. For example, in my opinion, I believe these animals are carrier for many rare diseases, which in turn could lead to an epidemic in times to come. In contrast, since these rare species are wonder of nature, they should be preserved for our future generations to observe and enjoy. As a result, children will learn about them and respect their exsistence.
On the other hand, I believe that these species should be preserved and studied upon by researchers. The reason for this is that, these animals tell us many things about past billion years. Their external and internal characteristics inform us about their existence and survival in the times before human. For example, study done by the UK news channel reported that, there are few rare species of dinosaurs that only consume fruits and leaves. They are not carnivorous and thus not a threat to other co-existing animals. However, because animals have a natural aggressive instinct so they can react in unexpected ways that could become catastrophic for people handling them. As a result, they need to be held up in safe confines away from public interactions, in order to prevent any accidents. Nevertheless, I believe that every animal species should have a free will of existence and measures should be undertaken to help them survive regardless of their ferocity.
In conclusion, although these animal species are dangerous and a threat for society, personally I believe they are creations of God and should be given a fair chance of survival in this world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96486486486 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70025429639 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516216216216 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2058577122 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.055555556 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154435012301 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488363710586 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342572612224 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963255854085 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271404107396 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.