Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, how people should be allowed to access museums is a controversial issue. In many museums, visitors are charged for admission. It would appear that this is beneficial.
On the one hand, perhaps the key supporting argument is that while public budgets are under tremendous pressure today, it is imperative that governments allocate money for issues that are of paramount importance such as education and health. This means that authorities should subsidize what are high priorities for everyone rather than what is the interest of a limited group of societies. In addition, free entry to museums tend to result in overcrowding which can ultimately lead to discouraging individuals who are real enthusiasts of museums. Thirdly, money generated from entry fees compensates for governments' insufficient budgets. This enables them to subsidize and develop, for example, educational system and health care services.
On the other hand, free entry would encourage more people to visit museums which would promote their knowledge about the history and heritage of their country. It is obvious that this could lead to improving the national identity of people. Secondly, there may be persons who love visiting museums while they cannot afford it. Hence, making visiting museums affordable for all income groups would seem to be justifiable. Therefore, the more museums would be free, the more individuals might be able to reap the benefit of them.
To sum up, although it might be true that free admission can enhance national pride and equality, these are outweighed by the contribution which the money generated from admission fees can make to the wellbeing of a society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35849056604 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80043225062 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592452830189 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6313495329 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.428571429 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271696171829 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840985457142 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589328279461 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155537821747 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375353843896 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.