Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, visitors are usually charged for admission to museums. Some people say this is beneficial; while others disagree In my opinion, on balance, I believe the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages.
On the one hand, there are significant benefits of charging tourists. Firstly, the entry fee is used for maintenance. It is widely seen that the cost of buying and preserving arts in museums us utterly expensive; therefore, charging people is right. Moreover, charging visitors enable museums to develop their facilities as well as touring program. The fee from tourists would play a vital part in decoration the rooms for them. This charge is as well used to build playgrounds for visitors to experience and to acknowledge more.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of this activity cannot be overlooked. The first disadvantage is over-pricing. Some museums expand their entry tickets, not for mentioned purposes but themselves. The wealthy can afford this fee; however, not every tourist can. Therefore, the knowledge of a nation cannot be widespread and passed down to younger generations. Moreover, charging opposites to the main purpose of the museum. Museums are places that contribute to spreading knowledge of culture, history, arts, even science or breakthroughs throughout the long-life history of human-beings. Because of that, everybody all has the right to get access to museums equally. Unfortunately, charging visitors does not follow this mission.
In conclusion, charging visitors to museums has both pros and cons. Still, on balance, I tend to believe this act has more disadvantages than the advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40310077519 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00593327899 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596899224806 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1938803573 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3684210526 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5789473684 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337927870308 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969948215879 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635640992317 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20375525259 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480526807531 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.