Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?

The interaction of human beings has changed noticeably due to the rapid enhancement of technology. The trend of changing patterns of communication affected by technology is a pros and cons development.

On the one hand, technology caters people for may benefits of communication. Firstly, advances in technology enable human beings to contact and keep in touch with each other through considerable distances. With the development of the internet as well as social networks, chat and video call via Messenger or Skype, for instance, facilitate people to make conversations throughout the world. Secondly, technology also enables new relationships. Social networks such as Facebook, Twitter or Instagram are tools for finding friends and creating new relationships with hundreds of people.

On the other hand, there are also significant weak points of technology on communication. With the development of chat and video call apps, people are accustomed to them and soon be isolated from real-life interaction. Face-to-face conversations will be, accordingly, discouraged from people's communication. Moreover, technology creates more 'virtual' relationships which are unsustainable and can lead to dangerous situations. People can be conned out of money by paying through their bank accounts, for example, or then be cyberbullied or even can be victims of homicide.

In conclusion, taking everything into consideration, even though the impressive development of technology provides human beings with benefits in interaction, there is also substantial backward.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 228.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86403508772 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41750547098 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.134119256 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.846153846 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9230769231 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253044306845 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934189740178 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337575253814 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149318282051 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428981859925 0.056905535591 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.41 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.