Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
In today’s world, it can be undeniable that technology has a great impact on human beings, including their interaction. There are several important changes that have taken place for individuals in making relationships and from my viewpoint, I suppose this trend brings to human life a positive side.
To begin with, there are some influences that modern advances have on human interaction nowadays. First and foremost, the Internet may help the public reach each other more rapidly with just a press of a button. It can be explained by the fact that with some social media such as Facebook, Email, or Zalo, people can connect to their relatives and friends whenever they want that they do not need to have face-to-face communication in reality. Another significant impact is the existence of distance working and learning online has been progressively increasing. For instance, during the Covid-19 pandemic, the public had to work and study from home by using smartphones or computers, as they could not go out; moreover, after the pandemic, telecommuting has become one of the most popular forms of work, especially for young generations in recent years.
Besides, I consider the accelerating trend of applying technological advice in communication to be a positive change. The primary rationale is that this modern advice helps people to save lots of time and make their connections more convenient due to its flexibility and accuracy. In contrast, a few decades ago, people had to wait for a long time to receive letters and information from each other. Furthermore, technology provides the community with opportunities to widen their knowledge about other nations as well as contact people all over the world without feeling a sense of hesitation of far distance or regional differences. As a result, they can make friends easily and create social network friendships through the Internet.
In conclusion, modern technological advances have changed people’s ways to create relationships a lot. Although there are maybe several limitations, I still believe that its positive side is much more significant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: WANT_THAT_I[6]
Message: Did you mean 'want them to'?
Suggestion: want them to
...eir relatives and friends whenever they want that they do not need to have face-to-face commun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30357142857 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01173418489 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60119047619 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0126240386 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248140067454 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080315213651 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683134605111 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154240906789 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551707960875 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.