In contemporary society, technology has a significant impact on the way people live. One of these influences is the variation in individual interaction. Wealth of factors can harm people's relationships. The essay that follows will point out some of the primary causes of this predicament and offer opinions on the importance of this transition.
First of all, the first point that has an effect on people's relationships is that people do not come into direct contact with one another. They only engage or communicate with one another online, in a virtual realm. This exists two parallel aspects. In the one hand, individuals will be convenient to interact with each other but don't need changing physical distance. The interaction will be run quickly without too much effort. In the other hand, that's point making people losing our actual spiritual connection to one another. Actually, when people meet in real life, they will experience rewarding emotions. For example, if we are in another country, we can only communicate with their family via computer displays; we cannot express all of the various feelings in your heart. Only if you have them inside in real life.
Secondly, the next impact is that there are too many relationships around in internet space. Some advantages include the ability to form relationships in order to serve their business, or simply being a person with whom we communicate on a regular basis, as if we were friends. However, people are occasionally sidetracked and do not devote enough attention to the proper ones. People become more distant as a result of this.
In conclusion, as we can see that technology has significantly impacted to people's relationships.It makes the communication of individuals change amazingly. However, it cannot be denied that they also have advantages and disadvantages but in my opinion every development has two sides. It is important for us to be aware of how meaningful relationships are in order to choose the right way to communicate effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
.... The essay that follows will point out some of the primary causes of this predicament and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...venient to interact with each other but dont need changing physical distance. The in...
^^^^
Line 2, column 449, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...out too much effort. In the other hand, thats point making people losing our actual s...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 738, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ia computer displays; we cannot express all of the various feelings in your heart. Only if...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt as a result of this. In conclusion, as we can see that technology has signif...
^^
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...echnology has significantly impacted to peoples relationships.It makes the communicatio...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...antly impacted to peoples relationships.It makes the communication of individuals ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15243902439 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02736380178 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1836485258 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277580496746 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783409124137 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640153270413 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163300457169 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117821191156 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.