Tourists damage many historical places, making them harder to preserve.
What are some of the reasons for this?
Suggest some ways to resolve this problem.
It is true that historical sites are taken risks by visitors causing difficulties for the recovery process. However, this can be remedied by setting up a program to enhance tourist’s consciousness and vulnerability about ancient things.
The primary cause of historical site destruction by travelers is that they have not intended to safeguard certain moments. Sometimes, visitors are fascinating to explore and sightseeing overly leads to distraction and result in breakage on heritage areas. Taking an example from temples in Thai Lan, with the massive number of visitors in a day, some of the ancient stuff were smashed and caused damages for those sites.
However, there are remedies for this problem that organizations should set up a program to spread knowledge as well as regulations about sightseeing sites in the initial time before visiting those. When travelers have been conscious obviously, they will reduce their actions to historical stuff. In fact, some tourist attractions imposed regulations to preserve damage from visitors, furthermore, organizing a workshop for a minute to transmit about the vulnerability of historical things to tourists before entering to those sites.
In short, the absence of visitors' consciousness leads to impairment of the historical site. Nevertheless, It is tackled by making a program to transmit knowledge to tourists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g overly leads to distraction and result in breakage on heritage areas. Taking an...
^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the massive number of visitors in a day, some of the ancient stuff were smashed a...
^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e massive number of visitors in a day, some of the ancient stuff were smashed and caused d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, in fact, in short, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 210.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55238095238 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07560071009 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0170181955 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196143257486 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681252906846 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517816244288 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111133486603 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518272048549 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.