Tourists damage many historical places, making them harder to preserve.
What are some of the reasons for this?
Suggest some ways to resolve this problem.
It is true that visitors put historical sites at risk, complicating the recovery process. This, however, can be solved by establishing a program to increase tourists' awareness and vulnerability to ancient things
The fundamental reason that travelers destroy historical sites is that they do not intend to preserve specific moments. Sometimes people are enthralled to investigate, and excessive touring leads to destruction and damage to heritage locations. Taking temples in Thai Lan as an example, with such a large number of tourists in a day, some of the old items were shattered, causing damage to those places.
However, there are solutions to this problem, such as groups establishing a program to distribute knowledge as well as regulations concerning sightseeing locations before visiting them. Obviously, when travelers remain conscious, they will limit their acts to historical events. In reality, in the United Kingdom, visitors are educated about royal palaces before being allowed to enter them. They are taught about the palace's history, cultural significance, and how to behave in order to avoid harming any historical treasures contained within it. Visitors visiting the palace will be able to enjoy and appreciate their experience while also learning how to conduct themselves properly.
In short, the absence of visitors' consciousness leads to impairment of the historical site. Nevertheless, It is tackled by making a program to educate tourists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...es in Thai Lan as an example, with such a large number of tourists in a day, some of the old item...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ch a large number of tourists in a day, some of the old items were shattered, causing damag...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'palaces'' or 'palace's'?
Suggestion: palaces'; palace's
...o enter them. They are taught about the palaces history, cultural significance, and how...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, in short, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01315144536 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647321428571 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4670800775 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.454545455 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173842060391 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532200122218 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416830344079 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933802181555 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309559181336 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.