Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
Technology has glided into our lives unknowingly. Indeed, it has changed the way we interact with everyone around us both positively and negatively.
Technology, or the internet in particular has broaden ways we could build relationships we never could in the past. To respond to the invention, new applications are introduced everyday. Meeting new people is now not a major concern, whether you are miles away or within the same neighbourhood. For instance, ‘Tinder’ - the online dating application allow users to meet their potential partner(s) by just a swipe. If agreed, users could arrange to meet face-to-face and develop the relationship. Many people has find it very convenient and a lot, do actually find partners via the app. Also, online communities allow netizens to feel the sense of belonging, as people with common interests would be able to open up and interact with each other online in the same interested sites.
In addition, technology could help enhance relationships that are long-distanced. In the past we would have to call someone, wait for them to answer, call again, and physically being next to a big telephone unable to move too far. We wouldn’t be able to see the person’s face. Now, long-distance could be made shorter. Video calls could be made, from and to anywhere in the world with internet. We also could drop a message and it would instantly send to the other person in no time.
On the other perspective, technology could make a relationship go worse if excessively used. Imagine going out to socialise with friends, but the only thing they do is consistently on the phone. Yes, technology helps enhance some relationships, but the ones we are interacting face-to-face are equally as important.
In conclusion, technology has created an opportunity and new ways we interact with people we never could before. New applications are developed everyday, making our lives much more convenient. However, technology should not be used to the point where users are addicted to them, this can create discord towards relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'broadened'.
Suggestion: broadened
...logy, or the internet in particular has broaden ways we could build relationships we ne...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ention, new applications are introduced everyday. Meeting new people is now not a major ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'found'.
Suggestion: found
...velop the relationship. Many people has find it very convenient and a lot, do actual...
^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...nes we are interacting face-to-face are equally as important. In conclusion, technology...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 145, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... before. New applications are developed everyday, making our lives much more convenient....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21726190476 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14910201563 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2830025383 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4761904762 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225805035387 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063010207211 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582935994833 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13766441222 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562396172196 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.