Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
It is debatable whether it is more suitable to start learning languages as early as primary school or starting later in secondary school. There are both pros and cons for this topic, which will be discussed below.
The most common argument is that younger people tends to pick up languages easier and faster than adults do. Children tends to absorb what is introduced to them unconsciously. Their brain is still developing similarly to toddlers – that is why children could speak their mother tongue fluently. Languages being introduced in the early stages would only be beneficial for children to quickly absorb and learn the language, having more time to improve in the future.
Primary school student does not receive as much stress as secondary school students. Thus, they could learn languages without having to pressure themselves to get better as fast as possible. For example, secondary school students would have to focus more on what they want to do in the future, or universities – it would be more likely if they would want to focus on the subjects they want to pursue instead of being forced to take a language class. Taking language class in primary also could be beneficial as students could learn about the culture since young.
However, learning languages when older does not necessary means that it is bad. Although, it would take a lot more effort to be fluent, class structures are better once you develop the skills to think critically. Grammars are taught carefully from one point to another, making sure students truly understand what is going on. When primary school classes would focus on students absorbing what they learn, rather than the understanding of the subject. For instance, taking language classes in universities tend to teach students every grammatical points. Whereas students are not likely to learn every single pieces of grammar.
In conclusion, it is most common for students to start learning languages in early stages. It gives the students less stress and could easily absorb the language. However, it is not always too late to start when students are older.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ng to pressure themselves to get better as fast as possible. For example, secondar...
^^
Line 7, column 555, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...each students every grammatical points. Whereas students are not likely to learn every ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, similarly, so, still, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08309455587 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50538291266 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512893982808 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4363281293 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3684210526 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244677058626 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081751421101 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682373786757 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148395952824 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611378848612 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.