The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The chart displays the total time residents in the UK spent on telephone calls between three categories during 1995-2002.
The usage of local fixed lines had been the highest every year in comparison to other categories. The usage of local fixed line fluctuated significantly from 1995-2002, starting with its lowest at around 72 billion minutes in 1995. It reached its peak in 1999 with approximately 90 billion minutes. However, fell to 72 billion minutes again, in 2002.
National and international fixed line calls grew steadily from 38 billion to 61 billion minutes throughout the period. Though, in the last two years it started to grow very slowly with only 1 billion minute difference.
The most dramatic growth was mobile calls. It started with just 4 billion minutes used in 1995 and grow slowly to 13 billion in 1999. From 1999 residents started to use a lot more mobile calls, as it grew rapidly to 45 billion minutes in 2002.
Overall, the use of local fixed lines was fluctuated and started to decrease in the last few years. However, National and international, and mobile calls had been increased gradually over the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...year in comparison to other categories. The usage of local fixed line fluctuated si...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to 72 billion minutes again, in 2002. National and international fixed line ca...
^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... billion minutes throughout the period. Though, in the last two years it started to gr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07329842932 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63631151957 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5936500357 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.75 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301145738505 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113513667329 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955907181632 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177126147832 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098815101096 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.