t is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
It is true that distinguishing between right and wrong is initially essential. While I accept that punishment might play a vital part in these situations, I believe that parents and teachers should choose proper ways to punish their children.
To begin with, punishments have great impacts on changing the awareness of children. They are used mainly when children tell lies and could help to eliminate bad behaviors. For instance, students who usually play truant are instantly punished. This method is used not only to stop this wrong activity but also to keep children under strict discipline. Additionally, sometimes children may misunderstand the words in parents' reprimand and keep making mistakes again. In these cases, punishments are vital in helping them realize the wrong and right side of the problem.
Nevertheless, punishments may take effect, some strict or physical castigation may have negative influences on children's psychology. In these cases, I believe educational punishments can fully take their advantage. For instance, instead of spanking, parents can reduce the time their children use technological devices as well as force them to do housework. At schools, teachers can punish students by telling them to take care of the garden or clean the classrooms and schoolyards. These are efficient ways to educate children rather than physically rough treatment.
In conclusion, in spite of the importance of educating children between wrong and right through punishments, more appropriate methods should be applied in these circumstances.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, nevertheless, so, well, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56066945607 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99352428657 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619246861925 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8093812372 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262176876592 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884549478724 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436406037681 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160839858679 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355288265656 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.