Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Indeed, people do not recycle enough their domestic waste and because of that legislation must be adopted to help this situation. In my opinion, I partly agree with this opinion.
To begin with, it is widely experienced that legal requirements would strictly reduce waste. The government could adopt the policy of classification trash into different categories. China, Korea, or Japan have strictly adhered to this regulation. There should be punishments for people who disobey the law. These measures would act as a deterrent and afterward encourage people to obey the law requires to recycle the waste of their households. The policy, consequently, could improve the habit of recycling of homeowners and create a waste-free environment for everyone.
However, I believe the government could do more than introduce recycling law. Firstly, rather than punishments, authorities should educate more. For example, students should be taught about recycling at school, and competitions or events must be held to help them put what they learned into practice. Moreover, the investigation into infrastructure for recycling should be done. The government could place bins in public places or install a separate machine in case homeowners do not classify trash correctly at home. In these situations, local and national authorities could call for businesses to help them with the facilities as well as sharing burdens. These measurements will effectively help to improve the situation and reduce a significant amount of waste.
In conclusion, besides introducing legislation on recycling, education and facilitated installations must be adopted to help recycle domestic waste in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'recycling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: recycling
...courage people to obey the law requires to recycle the waste of their households. The poli...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58754863813 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07102754174 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5953307393 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0407213267 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.75 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0625 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283632986365 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920199262846 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820352267108 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172349136968 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514780375533 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.